While Kern's book refers to the early 20th century, his analysis provides much insight into technological advances in modern society. The PBS movie Digital Nation explores the relationship between technology and culture. Modern society is constantly developing with new electronic devices and networking sites. Opposed to Kern's selected time period, modern society is quick to try out, and accept advancements despite positive or negative effects. The PBS movie investigates college students and the relationship they experience with modern technology. Students were found to believe that they were able to check email, text their friends, check facebook, watch television and do their homework at the same time. This was the perception of one college culture. A study however showed just the opposite, that students were less able to perform higher level tasks while being distracted by electronic means.
Another relationship society experiences with modern technology is social networking sites, online games, and virtual worlds. Rather than the conventional face to face interactions and conversations, society can now conduct everything from business to pleasure in an online virtual atmosphere. Social networking sites such as facebook or match.com create virtual environments for people to meet, plan, and interact with each other, companies like IBM can now conduct business online in virtual worlds and simulate a business meeting. This online 'virtual world' facilitates communication between its employees regardless of geographical position. While these online communication hubs are convenient, certain aspects of social mannerisms are lost. Face to face interaction is still unique and cannot be accurately emulated in virtual outlets. Facial expressions, hand gestures, and appearance allow for us to judge and base our social interactions and decisions. Even in society today, Kern's analysis of development are consistent. Technology affects an even greater population than in the early 20th century and our culture is now defined by the technology we are so quick to adopt.
Sources:
Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880 – 1918. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003. Print. Pages 1-35
Another relationship society experiences with modern technology is social networking sites, online games, and virtual worlds. Rather than the conventional face to face interactions and conversations, society can now conduct everything from business to pleasure in an online virtual atmosphere. Social networking sites such as facebook or match.com create virtual environments for people to meet, plan, and interact with each other, companies like IBM can now conduct business online in virtual worlds and simulate a business meeting. This online 'virtual world' facilitates communication between its employees regardless of geographical position. While these online communication hubs are convenient, certain aspects of social mannerisms are lost. Face to face interaction is still unique and cannot be accurately emulated in virtual outlets. Facial expressions, hand gestures, and appearance allow for us to judge and base our social interactions and decisions. Even in society today, Kern's analysis of development are consistent. Technology affects an even greater population than in the early 20th century and our culture is now defined by the technology we are so quick to adopt.
Sources:
Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880 – 1918. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003. Print. Pages 1-35
Digital Nation. Dir. Rachel Dretzin. Perf. Douglas Rushkoff. Frontline, 2010. Documentary.
I liked what you mentioned at the end about needing to talk to a person face-to-face to really understand them. I agree!
ReplyDeleteSince the virtual worlds are such a major part of businesses like IBM, do you think that eventually one would be able to decipher a person's emotions/intentions just by listening to their voice? That would be interesting.
I feel like this should be separated into two different essays. The first paragraph and the second paragraph share almost nothing in common, while the third is an extension of the second. As stand alone paragraphs they are written well and would probably only need a few minor adjustments. The only other glaring weakness I see in this post is it does not really make a point. You have a fair amount of facts to support what you're saying, and it's like you almost get there, but you never do. Writing with a more defined purpose will definitely help solve this.
ReplyDeleteEric Carl