In today’s modern world, methods of transportation are abundant. Although in general there are only two options – a form of public transportation, or your own private vehicle. Having lived in the suburbs of Atlanta for most of my life, the first time I had ever taken any form of public transportation was when I was 18 years old. If I ever needed to go somewhere, I would always take a car. I have a whole plethora of options within a 15 minute car ride from my house. With that being said, it has always been somewhat difficult to properly imagine what life must have been like before cars, buses, trains, airplanes, or even the stream boat. For me what may be simply a five minute car ride would have been for my ancestors half a day’s walk! It makes me wonder exactly how technology has altered our modern view point of space.
Figure 1: www.qualitytrading.com/illusions/girlwoman.html |
Because of modern inventions, such as cars, I don’t have to worry so much about the distance of my destination as much as I must worry about how long it will take to reach my destination. It may be faster with my own car, with the bus, or with a train, but in the end I know already know about how long each method will take me and which is the better option time wise. To be more specific, when choosing a method of transportation, the distance is not so much of a factor in choosing one of these methods, as much as the time each of the different methods will need to reach the destination. Because cars, buses, and trains can travel for long distances without stopping (excluding stops for fuel or human necessities), the distance between two points of interest is almost irrelevant! That is not to say that time is not relative to distance, but that due to our modern forms of transportation, the distance of 30 miles, for example, will not be a burden to travel.
However the opposite can be said of our ancestors. To them the distance of five miles, may be the most any of them were willing to travel in a day. With the only means of transportation available being your own two feet and possible a carriage or bicycle, having to travel further than five miles would have been an inconvenience. Their space was limited to the distance they were able to walk in a day. This perspective of space is totally different to our modern viewpoint. As a result of this different viewpoint, their perception of time was also altered. Because they can physically not travel as quickly as we can, their lives were a little bit “slower” than ours. That is not to say it was leisurely, but they may not have put so much emphasis on completing a task with in a specific time period.
Modern technology has made it easier and faster to complete multiple tasks within a 24 hour time period. I personally do not think of the physical distance a destination is, but rather how long it will take to arrive there by car. My great-grandfather, on the other hand, most likely put more emphasis on the distance of a destination before deciding to travel or not.
- Katherina Delgado
- Katherina Delgado
This is a really good post. I can tell that you knew what you were going to write about before you started, and you wrote to achieve that. I especially like the picture to help get your point across. That said, I think you may have put a little too much emphasis on the difference between time now and distance then. You lose a tiny bit of focus on your discussion of space by doing so, but it only detracts slightly from the overall essay as those are integral parts to it.
ReplyDeleteEric Carl
The introduction paragraph was very well written. It gave me a clear idea of what your essay was about. I found using the picture and comparing it to our view of visual space to geographical space to be very interesting. I agree that modern technology has made it much easier to complete many tasks in such a short span of time. Modern tech such as cars have expanded our ideas of convenient geographical space. It is now difficult for me to imagine spending most of my life in a 10-15 mile radius like Emma might have.
ReplyDeleteAndrew Corbitt